Today's Date: Add To Favorites   
Law firm violated debt collection statute, federal suit alleges
Court News | 2008/03/01 12:22
Pauline Sumowski filed suit in federal court Feb. 27, alleging the law firm Baker, Miller, Markoff & Krasny, LLC of Chicago violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, when trying to collect a debt owed by her deceased husband.

According to the complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, Al Sumowski opened a consumer credit card account with Discover Bank roughly 30 years ago and was the only authorized user on the account.

Sumowski claims that 10 years after her husband's death in 1990, Discover began sending billing statements directly to her demanding payment on the account.

"Mrs. Sumowski assumed that she was somehow liable for the Discover account and accordingly, she tried her best to make payments on it," the complaint states.

"When Mrs. Sumowski began having trouble paying some of her debts in 2006, due to increased family and household expenses, she was unable to make any further payments to Discover."

She claims that after missing payments, the Baker firm, on behalf of Discover, filed suit against her in Madison County on March 5, 2007, despite the fact that the debt is not owed by her.

Sumowski claims she was forced to hire an attorney and learned that she was not liable for the Discover account owed by her late husband.

According to Sumowski, the Baker firm attached a purported affidavit along with purported terms and conditions for the account that the firm claimed formed the basis of the original contract between Sumowski and Discover.

"That generic agreement, however, is incomplete, is dated several years after the alleged account at issue was opened, and thus, is not the agreement that governs the account at issue," the complaint states. "In fact, no evidence of any signed agreement between Mrs. Sumowski and Discover was attached to the State Court Lawsuit."

Sumowski also claims none of the billing statements that were offered as exhibits contained any new charges but only contained a demand for payment of a past due balance, late fees, penalties and credit protection services.

She claims the day her case was scheduled for trial, the Baker firm dismissed the suit.

According to Sumowski, the Baker firm violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by:

  • Falsely claiming that she owed the alleged Discover debt;
  • Falsely claiming that the account agreement attached to the complaint was a contract between Discover and herself;
  • Falsely stating in a sworn affidavit attached to the complaint that Discover's business records had been reviewed and confirmed that she owed a balance to Discover; and
  • Filing a lawsuit against her on a time-barred debt.

    Represented by David J. Philipps and Bonnie C. Dragotto of Palos Hills, Sumowski is seeking a judgment for actual and statutory damages, costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. The case has been assigned to District Judge Michael Reagan.


  • [PREV] [1] ..[2987][2988][2989][2990][2991][2992][2993][2994][2995].. [3014] [NEXT]
    All
    Securities Class Action
    Headline Legal News
    Stock Market News
    Court News
    Court Watch
    Legal Interview
    Securities Lawyers
    Securities Law Firm
    Topics in Legal News
    Attorney News
    Legal Focuses
    Opinions
    Legal Marketing
    Law Firm News
    Investment Fraud Litigation
    Texas’ migrant arrest law w..
    Former Georgia insurance com..
    Alabama woman who faked kidn..
    A Supreme Court ruling in a ..
    Denying same-sex marriage is..
    Trump wants N.Y. hush money ..
    China’s top court, prosecut..
    Supreme Court restores Trump..
    Supreme Court casts doubt on..
    Donald Trump appeals $454 mi..
    Alabama hospital pauses IVF ..
    Ken Paxton petitions to stop..
    Attorney Jenna Ellis pleads ..
    Trump arrives in federal cou..
    Why Trump's bid for presiden..
    Samsung chief is acquitted o..


       Lawyer & Law Firm Links
    St. Louis Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
    St. Charles DUI Attorney
    www.lynchlawonline.com
    New York Adoption Lawyers
    New York Foster Care Lawyers
    Adoption Pre-Certification
    www.lawrsm.com
    Car Accident Lawyers
    Sunnyvale, CA Personal Injury Attorney
    www.esrajunglaw.com
    Oregon Family Law Attorney
    Divorce Lawyer Eugene. Family Law
    www.mjmlawoffice.com
    Family Law in East Greenwich, RI
    Divorce Lawyer - Erica S. Janton
    Post-Divorce Issues Attorney
    Connecticut Special Education Lawyer
    www.fortelawgroup.com
       Legal Resource Links
    Securities fraud, also known as stock fraud and investment fraud, is a practice that induces investors to make purchase or sale decisions on the basis of false information, frequently resulting in losses, in violation of the securities laws. Securities Arbitration. Generally speaking, securities fraud consists of deceptive practices in the stock and commodity markets, and occurs when investors are enticed to part with their money based on untrue statements.
     
     
     

    The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Securities Law News as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case. | Affordable Law Firm Website Design by Law Promo