Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities firm headquartered in New York City, announces that a class action lawsuit has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee on behalf of shareholders of Green Bankshares, Inc. ("Green Bankshares” or the "Company”)

The complaint alleges that defendants knew or recklessly disregarded that their public statements concerning Green Bankshares’ business, operations and prospects were materially false and misleading. Specifically, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose: (i) that the Company was overvaluing the collateral of certain loans; (ii) that, as such, Green Bankshares was failing to timely take impairment charges to reduce the carrying values of certain loans to appropriate market values; (iii) that the Company lacked adequate internal and financial controls; and (iv) that, as a result, the Green Bankshares’ financial results were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
On October 20, 2010, Green Bankshares announced its financial results for the 2010 fiscal Q3 and disclosed that the Company’s net charge-offs increased on a sequential basis from $4.9 million in the prior quarter to $36.5 million. Furthermore, Green Bankshares indicated that it had engaged a third-party loan reviewer, which contributed to the asset quality-impact reflected in its Q3 results. As a result of this news, shares of the Company declined more than 43% to close at $3.68 per share on October 21, 2010.

The potential liability facing bankers arises from the $2 trillion in subprime, alt-A and option-adjustable rate mortgages that they underwrote and sold to investors, mostly as mortgage-backed securities during the home-lending boom of 2005 to 2007. The losses on the mortgages will be horrendous before the dust settles—over $700 billion on these and other so-called nonagency mortgage securities, according to New York mortgage-research specialist and broker Amherst Securities Group.

And now investors—from the federal housing giants Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNMA.OB - News) and Freddie Mac (NYSE: FMCC.OB - News) to major bond managers like closely held Pacific Investment Management and BlackRock (NYSE: BLK - News) —are fighting back. They are seeking to put back the mortgages to the banks from whence the investment flotsam came and force the banks to eat much of the mortgage losses.

The argument hinges on the arcane contract principle of representations and warranties, known as reps and warranties in legal jargon. Namely, did the mortgages go bad because of the unanticipated nationwide collapse in home prices (a so-called exogenous factor) or are the banks responsible for the mess because they "misrepresented" to the mortgage purchasers the shoddy quality of the mortgages they put in securities and pools?

lready some of the buyers have enjoyed a modicum of success in their putback efforts. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have managed to return over $13 billion in defective mortgages and are gearing up to do even more. Before it's all over, the banks may have to swallow more than $30 billion in losses from Freddie and Fannie putbacks alone, according to an estimate by the Washington, D.C., mortgage-research boutique Compass Point Research & Trading. That's because no bank in the mortgage business can afford to play hardball with secondary market behemoths like Fannie and Freddie, the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that own or guarantee about half of all home mortgages in the U.S.

A class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Vermont on behalf of purchasers of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. securities during the period from July 28, 2010, to September 29, 2010.

The complaint alleges that Green Mountain and certain of its officers violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by not disclosing improper revenue recognition practices.

On September 28, 2010, Green Mountain reported that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Division of Enforcement is conducting an investigation and seeking documents relating to certain revenue recognition practices and the Company's relationship with one of its fulfillment vendors. Additionally, Green Mountain announced that as of June 26, 2010, there is a cumulative $7.6 million overstatement of pre-tax income due to an accounting error.

In reaction to the news, Green Mountain shares fell 16.08% to close at $31.06 on September 29, 2010.

If you purchased Green Mountain securities during the Class Period, you may, no later than November 29, 2010, file a motion with the Court to appoint you lead plaintiff. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that directs the litigation, and will be the movant that the Court determines to have the largest financial interest in the litigation with claims typical of those of other class members and the ability to adequately represent the class. Your share in any recovery will not be enhanced by serving as a lead plaintiff. You do not need to move for lead plaintiff to recover as an absent class member. You may retain Milberg LLP, or other attorneys, for this action, but do not need to retain counsel to recover as an absent class member. The complaint in this action was not filed by Milberg.

Founded in 1965, Milberg has offices in New York, Los Angeles, Tampa, and Detroit. The Firm has litigated landmark cases and recovered billions for shareholders and consumers. Our website has additional information: (www.milberg.com).

Lead Counsel for the Class has announced, pursuant to an Order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, that a hearing in the class action entitled Fogarazzo, et al. v. Lehman Brothers, Inc., et al., No. 03 Civ.5194 (SAS) will be held on January 31, 2011, at 4:30 p.m., before The Honorable Shira A. Scheindlin, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 15C, New York, New York 10007, for the purpose of determining (1) whether the proposed Settlement of the claims against the Settling Defendants in the Action for the sum of $6,750,000 in cash should be approved by the Court as fair, reasonable, and adequate to Members of the Class; (2) whether, thereafter, this Action should be dismissed with prejudice as regards the Settling Defendants pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Settlement Agreement dated as of August 23, 2010; (3) whether the proposed plan to distribute the Settlement proceeds (the "Plan of Allocation") is fair, reasonable, and adequate, and therefore should be approved; and (4) whether the application of Lead Counsel for the payment of attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Settlement involving the Settling Defendants, and reimbursement of Lead Plaintiffs' reasonable costs and expenses (including lost wages) directly related to their representation of the Class should be approved.

If you purchased or otherwise acquired shares of RSL Communications, Inc. common stock between April 30, 1999 and December 29, 2000, your rights may be affected by this Settlement.  If you have not received a detailed Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action, Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Settlement Fairness Hearing ("Notice") and a copy of the Proof of Claim and Release, you may obtain copies by mail: RSL Communications Securities Litigation, c/o Berdon Claims Administration LLC. P.O. Box 9014, Jericho NY 11753-8914; by toll-free phone: 800-766-3330; by fax: 516-9831-0810; or you can download a copy at www.berdonclaims.com.  If you are a Class Member, in order to share in the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, you must submit a Proof of Claim and Release postmarked no later than February 22, 2011, establishing that you are entitled to recovery.

PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT OR THE CLERK'S OFFICE REGARDING THIS NOTICE.  If you have any questions about the Settlement, you may contact Lead Counsel at: Curtis V. Trinko, Esq.; The Law Office of Curtis V. Trinko LLP; 16 West 46th Street, 7th Floor; New York, NY 10036; 212-490-9550; ctrinko@trinko.com; or go to the Claims Administrator's website: www.berdonclaims.com.

Goldfarb Branham LLP is investigating potential shareholder claims against the officers and directors of Johnson & Johnson due to lack of internal controls that led to phantom recalls and several class action lawsuits. Johnson & Johnson investors are encouraged to contact the firm at 877-583-2855 or hlindley@goldfarbbranham.com to learn about their rights.

“A class action complaint alleges that defendants received numerous complaints that Tylenol products made in Puerto Rico had a ‘musty’ odor, but failed to conduct an adequate investigation or notify the Federal Drug Administration,” securities lawyer Hamilton Lindley said. “It also alleges that company executives failed to take corrective actions when foreign materials were found in a Pennsylvania manufacturing facility. Additionally, when defendants learned of problems with its Motrin drug, they sent contractors to stores to purchase the product instead of mentioning a recall.”

Goldfarb Branham LLP is investigating a derivative lawsuit against company officers and directors for allowing this to occur. Derivative lawsuits often lead to restored confidence in companies involved in financial scandal and a resulting increase in shareholder value. Concerned shareholders who still hold their shares are urged to contact attorney Hamilton Lindley at 877-583-2855 or hlindley@goldfarbbranham.com.